ABSTRACT
Background. Cancer patients (CPs) with COVID-19 have an increased risk of adverse outcomes. In addition, CPs seem to have a lower immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This study aimed to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (anti-S Abs) following COVID-19 vaccination in CPs and healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods. We conducted a point-seroprevalence study in CPs and HCWs who received a two-dose scheme with either BNT162b2, AZD1222, or Sputnik-V vaccine. We measured anti-S Abs by quantitative immunoassay to assess humoral immune response. Besides, we quantified anti-nucleocapsid antibodies in a subgroup of individuals to determine prior infection. We compared anti-S Abs titers in both groups and stratified by vaccine type, prior infection, and clinical characteristics. We conducted a multivariate logistic regression to determine variables associated with a poor humoral response. Results. Six hundred forty-one individuals were included: 174 (27%) CPs and 467 (73%) HCWs. The median anti-S Abs titter was higher among HCWs compared to CPs (2568 U/mL vs. 1807 U/mL, p=0.002). Both CPs and HCWs with prior infection had higher anti-S Abs titter (p< 0.001). Regardless of the time since vaccination, a higher proportion of subjects with titers < 250 U/mL was observed in CPs (p< 0.001) (Fig 2). In the multivariate analysis, older age (p=0.036), AZD1222 (p=0.003), and Sputnik-V (p=0.020) were associated with lower humoral response among the entire cohort. SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titers among cancer patients and healthcare workers. Global differences in anti-S Abs titers between CPs and HCWs groups (a) and antibody titers in CPs and HCWs groups stratified by type of received vaccine (b). Abbreviations: CP: Cancer patients, HCW: Healthcare workers. SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titers according to time since vaccination among cancer patients and healthcare workers. Abbreviations: CP: Cancer patients, HCW: Healthcare workers. Conclusion. In this study, both CPs and HCWs showed an adequate response to vaccination;however, CPs had lower anti-S Abs titers and a faster decline over time. Based on our results, new strategies should be assessed to sustain the humoral response to vaccination and thus decrease the COVID-19 burden among the oncologic population.
ABSTRACT
Background. Literature on SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients is scarce in Latin America. This population seems to have a higher risk for adverse outcomes. This study aims to correlate clinical characteristics with outcomes in patients with cancer in a referral center in Mexico. Methods. We included patients with cancer and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, from April, 19 to December 30, 2020, at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico. Clinical information was obtained from medical and epidemiological records. We conducted a descriptive analysis. For the association between variables with hospitalization, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and mortality;univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed;odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results. Four hundred thirty-three patients were included;268 (62%) were female, the median age was 55 years. One hundred thirty-five (31%), 130 (30%), and 93 (21%) patients had obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus (DM), respectively. Three hundred forty-one (79%) had solid cancer;82 (19%) hematological malignancy (HM), and 10 (2%) were under evaluation for cancer diagnosis. One hundred seventy (39%) had advanced or metastatic cancer. One hundred ninety-eight (46%) patients were hospitalized. Risk factors were: age (p= 0.001);woman (p=0.019);HM (p=0.050) and advanced or metastatic cancer (p= 0.041). Fourty-five (10%) patients required IMV. Age (p=0.018);DM (p=0.041);C-Reactive Protein (p= 0.002), and LDH (p= 0.033) were associated with invasive mechanical ventilation. Mortality within 30-days after diagnosis was 19% (82 cases). Associated characteristics were: age (p=0.041);lymphocytes (p=0.049);creatinine (p=0.005) and albumin (p=0.001). Conclusion. In this study, patients with cancer showed higher mortality, need of hospitalization, and invasive mechanical ventilation compared with groups of patients without cancer. We did not find an increased risk in mortality for hematological malignancies. Although our cohort was younger than others previously reported, age was a strong predictor of adverse outcomes. Variables associated with IMV and death were similar to those previously described in cancer patients with COVID-19.